Buscar

Estamos realizando la búsqueda. Por favor, espere...

Detalle_Publicacion

Evaluation of early cholecystectomy versus delayed cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate if early cholecystectomy (EC) is the most appropriate treatment for acute cholecystitis compared to delayed cholecystectomy (DC). Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 1043 patients was carried out, with a group of 531 EC cases and a group of 512 DC patients. The following parameters were recorded: (1) postoperative hospital morbidity, (2) hospital mortality, (3) days of hospital stay, (4) readmissions, (5) admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), (6) type of surgery, (7) operating time, and (8) reoperations. In addition, we estimated the direct cost savings of implementing an EC program. Results: The overall morbidity of the EC group (29.9%) was significantly lower than the DC group (38.7%). EC demonstrated significantly better results than DC in days of hospital stay (8.9 versus 15.8 days), readmission percentage (6.8% versus 21.9%), and percentage of ICU admission (2.3% versus 7.8%), which can result in reducing the direct costs. The patients who benefited most from an EC were those with a Charlson index > 3. Conclusions: EC is safe in patients with acute cholecystitis and could lead to a reduction in the direct costs of treatment

 Autoría: Sánchez-Carrasco M., Rodríguez-Sanjuán J.C., Martín-Acebes F., Llorca-Diáz F.J., Gómez-Fleitas M., Zambrano Munõz R., Sánchez-Manuel F.J.,

 Fuente: HPB Surgery: A World Journal of Hepatic, Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery, 2016, 4614096

Editorial: New York : Hindawi Publishers

 Año de publicación: 2016

Nº de páginas: 9

Tipo de publicación: Artículo de Revista

 DOI: 10.1155/2016/4614096

ISSN: 0894-8569,1607-8462

Autoría

SÁNCHEZ CARRASCO, MIGUEL

MARTÍN ACEBES, FERNANDO

FRANCISCO JAVIER LLORCA DIAZ

MANUEL GOMEZ FLEITAS

ZAMBRANO MUÑOZ, ROCÍO

SÁNCHEZ MANUEL, FRANCISCO J