Buscar

Estamos realizando la búsqueda. Por favor, espere...

Impact of antibiotic prophylaxis in second-stage surgery in joint prosthesis infection treated with two-stage exchange. A multicenter case-control study

Abstract: Introduction: After two-stage exchange due to prosthetic joint infection (PJI), the new prosthesis carries a high risk of reinfection (RePJI). There isn`t solid evidence regarding the antibiotic prophylaxis in 2nd-stage surgery. The objective of this study is to describe what antibiotic prophylaxis is used in this surgery and evaluate its impact on the risk of developing RePJI. Methods: Retrospective multicenter case?control study in Spanish hospitals. The study included cases of PJI treated with two-stage exchange and subsequently developed a new infection. For each case, two controls were included, matched by prosthesis location, center, and year of surgery. The prophylaxis regimens were grouped based on their antibacterial spectrum, and we calculated the association between the type of regimen and the development of RePJI using conditional logistic regression, adjusted for possible confounding factors. Results: We included 90 cases from 12 centers, which were compared with 172 controls. The most frequent causative microorganism was Staphylococcus epidermidis with 34 cases (37.8%). Staphylococci were responsible for 50 cases (55.6%), 32 of them (64%) methicillin-resistant. Gram-negative bacilli were involved in 30 cases (33.3%), the most common Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In total, 83 different antibiotic prophylaxis regimens were used in 2nd-stage surgery, the most frequent a single preoperative dose of cefazolin (48 occasions; 18.3%); however, it was most common a combination of a glycopeptide and a beta-lactam with activity against Pseudomonas spp (99 cases, 25.2%). In the adjusted analysis, regimens that included antibiotics with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci AND Pseudomonas spp were associated with a significantly lower risk of RePJI (adjusted OR?=?0.24; 95% IC: 0.09?0.65). Conclusions: The lack of standardization in 2nd-satge surgery prophylaxis explains the wide diversity of regimens used in this procedure. The results suggest that antibiotic prophylaxis in this surgery should include an antibiotic with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci and Pseudomonas.

 Fuente: European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2024, 43, 1319-1328

 Editorial: Springer

 Año de publicación: 2024

 Nº de páginas: 10

 Tipo de publicación: Artículo de Revista

 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-024-04838-3

 ISSN: 0934-9723

 Url de la publicación: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-024-04838-3

Autoría

BARBERO ALLENDE, JOSÉ M.

FERNÁNDEZ ANTÓN, ENCARNACIÓN

GÓMEZ-JUNYENT, JOAN

SORLÍ REDÓ, LLUISA

RODRÍGUEZ-PARDO, DOLORS

MURILLO RUBIO, ÓSCAR

ESCUDERO SÁNCHEZ, ROSA

GARCÍA GUTIÉRREZ, MANUEL

PORTILLO, MARÍA EUGENIA

SANCHO, IGNACIO

RICO NIETO, ALICIA

GUIO CARRIÓN, LAURA

SORIANO VILADOMIU, ALEX

MORATA RUIZ, LAURA

ABAJO IGLESIAS, FRANCISCO JOSÉ