Search

Searching. Please wait…

Serological clusters in systemic lupus erythematosus and its clinical and prognostic implications: a longitudinal cohort study

Abstract: Introduction: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disorder characterized by multi-organ involvement and variable clinical manifestations. Recurrent clinical patterns suggest distinct phenotypes, where cluster analysis of autoantibodies could identify prognostic subtypes. Objectives: To define and describe serological clusters and their clinical-epidemiological characteristics, as well as their association with comorbidities, disease activity measures, severity, and damage. Materials and methods: Descriptive, observational, and multicenter study including SLE patients from the Spanish Registry RELESSER. Gower distance was used for cluster analysis. Results: A total of 1,740 patients from the cross-sectional phase and 718 from the prospective phase with a four-year follow-up were included. Four serological clusters were identified. Cluster 1 (negative for extractable nuclear antigen [ENA]) was characterized by a lower frequency of vasculitis, leukopenia, and lymphopenia. Cluster 2 (positive antiphospholipid antibodies) more frequently presented haemolytic anaemia, thrombocytopenia, vasculitis and visual alterations and required greater use of immunoglobulins and oral anticoagulants. Cluster 3 (positive anti-SSA/Ro and anti-SSB/La) had a lower incidence of lupus nephritis. Cluster 4 (positive anti-Sm and anti-ribonucleoproteins) was characterized by higher rates of lupus nephritis, leukopenia, lymphopenia, hypocomplementemia, myositis and cutaneous manifestations and greater use of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants. Patients in cluster 2 had higher baseline damage scores measured by the SLICC/ACR DI (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index), while patients in cluster 4 had higher severity scores measured by the Katz Index. These differences among clusters persisted over the four-year of follow-up. Conclusion: In our SLE patient population, the serological profile is key not only for clinical stratification but also for prognostic value.

 Fuente: Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, 2025, 74, 152819

 Publisher: Elsevier

 Year of publication: 2025

 No. of pages: 8

 Publication type: Artículo de Revista

 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152819

 ISSN: 0049-0172,1532-866X

 Publication Url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152819

Authorship

IBARGUENGOITIA BARRENA, OIHANE

LEYRE RIANCHO ZARRABEITIA

PLAZA, ZULEMA

RÚA FIGUEROA, ÍÑIGO

MENOR ALMAGRO, RAÚL

SERRANO BENAVENTE, BELÉN

RUBIO MUÑOZ, PAULA

GALINDO IZQUIERDO, MARÍA

FERNÁNDEZ NEBRO, ANTONIO

RUIZ LUCEA, M.E.

CALVO ALÉN, JAIME

TOMERO MURIEL, EVA G.

URIARTE ISACELAYA, ESTHER

PECONDON ESPAÑO, ANGELA

FREIRE, MERCEDES

GARCÍA FERNÁNDEZ, JAVIER

EXPÓSITO, LORENA

IBAÑEZ BARCELÓ, MÓNICA