Abstract: In recent years, split-step finite-difference time-domain (SS-FDTD) methods have attracted much attention and many implementations have been developed to improve their accuracy and efficiency. In this communication the equivalence between some of these recently reported techniques and conventional schemes is shown. More specifically, we prove that there are four-stage split-step (4SS)-FDTD algorithms that can be reinterpreted as classic two-stage split-step (2SS)-FDTD schemes yielding the same local truncation errors and numerical dispersion relationships. The analytical results are validated by numerical simulations.

Authorship

Download reference