Buscar

Estamos realizando la búsqueda. Por favor, espere...

Detalle_Publicacion

Fidaxomicin monotherapy versus standard therapy combined with bezlotoxumab for treating patients with Clostridioides difficile infection at high risk of recurrence: a matched cohort study

Abstract: Background: Both fidaxomicin and bezlotoxumab (used in combination with an antibiotic against Clostridioides difficile) achieve reductions in recurrence rates of C. difficile infection (CDI). However, the two strategies have never been compared. Methods: Data from two retrospective cohorts of 'real-life' use of fidaxomicin and bezlotoxumab in combination with a standard anti-C. difficile antibiotic were used to compare the rates of recurrence of both strategies. Since the two cohorts were not identical, we used a propensity score analysis. Results: Three hundred and two patients were included: 244 in the fidaxomicin cohort and 78 in the bezlotoxumab cohort. A history of renal failure or immunosuppression was more frequent in patients receiving bezlotoxumab (39.7% and 66.7% versus 26.6% and 38.9%; P = 0.03 and P < 0.001, respectively), but the severity and number of previous CDI episodes were similar in both cohorts. We observed that 19.3% of the patients in the fidaxomicin cohort experienced recurrence, compared with 14.1% in the bezlotoxumab cohort (OR 1.45; 95% CI 0.71-2.96; P = 0.29) but the difference remained non-significant after propensity score matching using previously defined variables (OR 1.24; 95% CI 0.50-3.07; P = 0.64). Moreover, the multivariate analysis did not show differences depending on the drug used. Conclusions: We observed that fidaxomicin and bezlotoxumab are prescribed in similar clinical scenarios, although those treated with bezlotoxumab have greater comorbidity. The proportion of recurrences was numerically lower in those treated with bezlotoxumab, although the propensity analysis did not find significant differences between the two drugs.

Otras publicaciones de la misma revista o congreso con autores/as de la Universidad de Cantabria

 Fuente: J Antimicrob Chemother . 2022 Jun 29;77(7):1996-2002

Editorial: Oxford University Press

 Año de publicación: 2022

Nº de páginas: 7

Tipo de publicación: Artículo de Revista

 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac106

ISSN: 0305-7453,1460-2091

Url de la publicación: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkac106

Autoría

ESCUDERO-SANCHEZ, ROSA

MURIEL GARCÍA, ALFONSO

GARCÍA FERNÁNDEZ, SERGIO

VALENCIA ALIJO, ANGELA

TASIAS PITARCH, MARIONA

MERINO DE LUCAS, ESPERANZA

GUTIERREZ ROJAS, ANGELA

RAMOS MARTÍNEZ, ANTONIO

SALAVERT LLETÍ, MIGUEL

GINER, LIVIA

RUÍZ RUIGOMEZ, MARÍA

GARCÍA BASAS, LORENA

FERNÁNDEZ FRADEJAS, JORGE

OLMEDO SAMPEDRIO, MARÍA

CANO YUSTE, ANGELA

DÍAZ POLLÁN, BEATRIZ

RODRÍGUEZ HERNÁNDEZ, MARÍA JESÚS

MARTÍN SEGARRA, ORIOL

SÁEZ BEJAR, CARMEN

CARLOS ARMIÑANZAS CASTILLO