Buscar

 Detalle_Publicacion

Sporadic occupation in Armiña cave during the Upper Magdalenian: What for?

Abstract: The cave of Armiña is the lower level of the same karst cave system as Atxurra Cave, which has a habitat site in the entrance, covering from the Gravettian to the Late Magdalenian periods, and an important Paleolithic rock art ensemble in the inner part of the cave. The current entrance of Armiña was opened artificially at the end of the 19th century. Between 2016 and 2017 several tests and a 6 m2 excavation were performed in the main hall of Armiña to evaluate its archaeological record. The excavated stratigraphic sequence is sealed by a succession of sterile units (Ia-Ic) with no archaeological or faunal remains. At the bottom of this sterile unit a continuous flowstone separates it from Unit III, an almost sterile unit containing a few transported bones, charcoal fragments and a few lithics found in contact with Unit IV, where the bulk of archaeological remains were found. In Unit IV, a number of bone fragments and lithic tools are associated with a small hearth and an ocher stain. The available archaeological evidence, and the first results of the ongoing multiproxy analyses, suggest that the deposit is the result of a very short occupation event or even shorter visits to this spot inside the cave. These visits were more or less contemporaneous with the occupation levels in Atxurra and probably correspond chronologically to the artistic activity in the deep part of the cave. However, although Armiña Cave is quite suitable for human settlement, only a short-term occupation has been recognized. This could partially be related to the morpho-topographic conditions of the cave which would imply that access from the exterior was difficult at the time of the occupation. Thus, the occupation site might be defined as an Inner Archaeological Context (I.A.C.). Therefore, our main hypothesis is that this short-term occupation was an activity spot for Magdalenian explorers inside the cave, in which the activities they carried out were not exclusively related to technological and subsistence practices, nor to the execution of art, given the particular nature of the finds and the absence of Paleolithic artistic manifestations in Armiña.

Otras publicaciones de la misma revista o congreso con autores/as de la Universidad de Cantabria

 Autoría: Rios-Garaizar, J., San Emeterio, A., Arriolabengoa, M., Aranbarri, J., Rofes, J., Marín-Arroyo, A.B., Rivero, O., Intxaurbe, I., Arranz-Otaegui, A., Salazar, S., Medina-Alcaide, M.Á., Garate, D.

 Fuente: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 30 (2020), 102271

Editorial: Elsevier

 Fecha de publicación: 01/04/2020

Nº de páginas: 14

Tipo de publicación: Artículo de Revista

DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102271

ISSN: 2352-409X,2352-4103

Url de la publicación: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102271

Autores/as

RÍOS GARAIZAR, JOSEBA

SAN EMETERIO GÓMEZ, AIXA

ARRIOLABENGOA, MARTIN

ARANBARRI, JOSU

RIVERO VILÁ, OLIVIA

IÑAKI INTXAURBE ALBERDI

ARRANZ OTAEGUI, AMAIA

SALAZAR, SERGIO

MEDINA ALCAIDE, MARÍA ÁNGELES