Buscar

Estamos realizando la búsqueda. Por favor, espere...

Detalle_Publicacion

Particle repositioning maneuver versus Brandt-Daroff exercise for treatment of unilateral idiopathic BPPV of the posterior semicircular canal: a randomized prospective clinical trial with short- and long-term outcome

Abstract: Objective: To compare the outcome and probability of recurrence in a series of patients with unilateral idiopathic benign paroxysmal positional vertigo of the posterior canal (PC-BPPV) that were randomly treated by Brandt-Daroff exercise (B-D exercise) or by particle repositioning maneuver (PRM). Study Design: Randomized prospective clinical trial. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Patients were included in this study if they complained of vertigo and had been diagnosed as having unilateral idiopathic PC-BPPV for at least 1 week before Dix-Hallpike maneuver (DHM), remained for 30 days in the randomly assigned treatment, and had at least 48 months? follow-up. Intervention: Forty-one patients were treated with a single PRM and 40 patients by B-D exercise. Main Outcome Measure: Resolution of benign paroxysmal positional nystagmus on the DHM. The probability of recurrence was also studied. Results: At Day 7, DHM was negative in 80.5% of the PRM-treated patients and in 25% of those treated by B-D exercise (p < 0.001). At Month 1, the differences between both treatment groups remained statistically significant (92.7% in PRM versus 42.5% in the B-D exercise had a negative DHM; p < 0.001). The variable that influenced that DHM became negative was the PRM (RR = 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.5?9.2; p < 0.001). The number of recurrences in PRM and B-D exercise were 0.56 ± 0.8 and 0.48 ± 0.8, respectively (p = 0.48). The recurrence rate at 48 months was 35.5% (15/41) in B-D exercise and 36.6% (9/31) in the PRM group (p = 0.62). Although the time interval until the first recurrence was similar (p = 0.44), patients included in the PRM group showed a significantly longer time interval between the first and second recurrence (p = 0.04). Conclusion: PRM is more effective treatment and as safe as B-D exercise in the short term for unilateral and idiopathic PC-BPPV, and although it does not reduce the probability of recurrence in the 4-year follow-up period compared with B-D exercise, it may delay the second recurrence?s onset in those patients who had already experienced a single recurrence. Our study supports the use of PRM as the treatment of choice in unilateral and idiopathic PC-BPPV, although exercise may be also considered as an alternative treatment in selected cases.

 Autoría: Amor-Dorado J.C., Barreira-Fernández M.P., Aran-Gonzalez I., Casariego-Vales E., Llorca J., González-Gay M.A.,

 Fuente: Otology and Neurotology, 2012, 33(8), 1401-1407

Editorial: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

 Año de publicación: 2012

Nº de páginas: 7

Tipo de publicación: Artículo de Revista

 DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318268d50a

ISSN: 1531-7129,1537-4505

Url de la publicación: https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318268d50a

Autoría

AMOR-DORADO, JUAN CARLOS

BARREIRA-FERNÁNDEZ, MARÍA PILAR

ARÁN-GONZÁLEZ, ISMAEL

CASARIEGO-VALES, EMILIO

FRANCISCO JAVIER LLORCA DIAZ