Estamos realizando la búsqueda. Por favor, espere...
1452
37
174
32671
4708
2710
372
420
Abstract: This report represents a further update of the consensus panel criteria for the assessment of clinical response in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM). These criteria have been updated in light of further data demonstrating an improvement in categorical responses with new drug regimens as well as acknowledgement of the fact that such responses are predictive of overall outcome. A number of key changes are proposed but challenges do however remain and these include the variability in kinetics of immunoglobulin M (IgM) reduction with different treatment modalities and the apparent discrepancy between IgM and bone marrow/tissue response noted with some regimens. Planned sequential bone marrow assessments are encouraged in clinical trials.
Fuente: British Journal of Haematology, 2013, 160(2), 171-176
Editorial: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Año de publicación: 2013
Nº de páginas: 6
Tipo de publicación: Artículo de Revista
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12102
ISSN: 0007-1048,1365-2141
SCOPUS
Citas
Google Scholar
Métricas
Leer publicación
OWEN, ROGER G.
KYLE, ROBERT A.
STONE, MARVIN J.
RAWSTRON, ANDY C.
LEBLOND, VERONIQUE
MERLINI, GIAMPAOLO
GARCIA-SANZ, RAMON
ENRIQUE MARIA OCIO SAN MIGUEL
MORRA, ENRICA
MOREL, PIERRE
ANDERSON, KENNETH C.
PATTERSON, CHRISTOPHER J.
MUNSHI, NIKHIL C.
TEDESCHI, ALESSANDRA
JOSHUA, DOUGLAS E.
KASTRITIS, EFSTATHIOS
TERPOS, EVANGELOS
GHOBRIAL, IRENE M.
LELEU, XAVIER
GERTZ, MORIE A.
ANSELL, STEPHEN M.
MORICE, WILLIAM G.
KIMBY, EVA
TREON, STEVEN P.
Volver